<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Project Management Lessons &#187; Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/category/testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myprojectlessons.com</link>
	<description>Lessons learned in Project Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Check Geotechnical Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/09/check-geotechnical-reports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/09/check-geotechnical-reports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprojectlessons.com/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check and confirm geotechnical reports that are supplied to you in a contract. The client may supply reports that are old or inaccurate. Specify in the contract that you are relying on the accuracy of their reports. If that is not acceptable, budget for new testing and reports. Related Posts Document Reliance on Information Check [...]

<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/document-reliance-on-information/" rel="bookmark">Document Reliance on Information</a><!-- (10.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/check-references/" rel="bookmark">Check References</a><!-- (6.9)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/treat-restarted-projects-as-new-projects/" rel="bookmark">Treat Restarted Projects as New Projects</a><!-- (6.3)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Check and confirm geotechnical reports that are supplied to you in a contract.</strong></p>
<p>The client may supply reports that are old or inaccurate.</p>
<p>Specify in the contract that you are relying on the accuracy of their reports. If that is not acceptable, budget for new testing and reports.</p>


<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/document-reliance-on-information/" rel="bookmark">Document Reliance on Information</a><!-- (10.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/check-references/" rel="bookmark">Check References</a><!-- (6.9)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/treat-restarted-projects-as-new-projects/" rel="bookmark">Treat Restarted Projects as New Projects</a><!-- (6.3)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/09/check-geotechnical-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review For Blind Spots</title>
		<link>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/05/review-for-blind-spots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/05/review-for-blind-spots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprojectlessons.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To overcome blind spots in your project, get other project managers (from outside that project) to review your project. This should be done regularly as part of a scheduled process. It should include giving that PM a summary of the project and showing them around the project (if a construction site). This is particularly important [...]

<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/regular-projects-review-meetings/" rel="bookmark">Regular Projects Review Meetings</a><!-- (10.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/visit-the-intended-site/" rel="bookmark">Visit the Intended Site</a><!-- (10.4)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/01/formal-handover-meeting/" rel="bookmark">Formal Handover Meeting</a><!-- (7.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To overcome blind spots in your project, get other project managers (from outside that project) to <strong>review your project</strong>.</p>
<p>This should be done regularly as part of a scheduled process.</p>
<p>It should include giving that PM a summary of the project and showing them around the project (if a construction site). This is particularly important if you are new to that industry. They may spot problems that you have overlooked.</p>


<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/regular-projects-review-meetings/" rel="bookmark">Regular Projects Review Meetings</a><!-- (10.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/visit-the-intended-site/" rel="bookmark">Visit the Intended Site</a><!-- (10.4)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/01/formal-handover-meeting/" rel="bookmark">Formal Handover Meeting</a><!-- (7.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/05/review-for-blind-spots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Contaminated?</title>
		<link>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/is-it-contaminated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/is-it-contaminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contaminated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsuitable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprojectlessons.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check if &#8220;unsuitable&#8221; soil/fill is really contaminated. It might me that it was just wet or not compact-able. It may not be contaminated. Avoid paying for removal of &#8220;contaminated&#8221; material unless it really is. Some people will assume &#8220;unsuitable&#8221; means &#8220;contaminated&#8221;, this may not be the case. Unsuitable (not contaminated) could be used for sound [...]

<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/08/eliminate-unnecessary-features/" rel="bookmark">Eliminate Unnecessary Features</a><!-- (6.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/wet-weather-delays/" rel="bookmark">Wet Weather Delays</a><!-- (5.2)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check if &#8220;unsuitable&#8221; soil/fill is really contaminated. It might me that it was just wet or not compact-able. It may not be contaminated.</p>
<p>Avoid paying for removal of &#8220;contaminated&#8221; material unless it really is. Some people will assume &#8220;unsuitable&#8221; means &#8220;contaminated&#8221;, this may not be the case.</p>
<p>Unsuitable (not contaminated) could be used for sound barriers, or other non structural areas.</p>


<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/08/eliminate-unnecessary-features/" rel="bookmark">Eliminate Unnecessary Features</a><!-- (6.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/wet-weather-delays/" rel="bookmark">Wet Weather Delays</a><!-- (5.2)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/is-it-contaminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review Test Results Early</title>
		<link>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/review-test-results-early/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/review-test-results-early/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprojectlessons.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review test results before samples are destroyed. It is too late to get them retested later if they have already been destroyed or disposed of. It is best to review test reports as soon as they are received. Test reports and results should include descriptions of test methods so that they can be compared to [...]

<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/map-soil-testing/" rel="bookmark">Map Soil Testing</a><!-- (9.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/05/review-for-blind-spots/" rel="bookmark">Review For Blind Spots</a><!-- (8.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/regular-projects-review-meetings/" rel="bookmark">Regular Projects Review Meetings</a><!-- (6.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Review test results before samples are destroyed</strong>.</p>
<p>It is too late to get them retested later if they have already been destroyed or disposed of.</p>
<p>It is best to review test reports as soon as they are received.</p>
<p>Test reports and results should include descriptions of test methods so that they can be compared to what is expected.</p>


<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ol>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/map-soil-testing/" rel="bookmark">Map Soil Testing</a><!-- (9.6)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/05/review-for-blind-spots/" rel="bookmark">Review For Blind Spots</a><!-- (8.1)--></li>
		<li><a href="http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/04/regular-projects-review-meetings/" rel="bookmark">Regular Projects Review Meetings</a><!-- (6.8)--></li>
	</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myprojectlessons.com/2009/03/review-test-results-early/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

